US Department of State
 Daily Press Briefing
Sean McCormack, Spokesman
Washington, DC
January 25, 2007
 MR. MCCORMACK: We would appeal for calm -- and I've seen certainly on  the TV screens and the press reports about the violence that has broken out at  one of the universities there. I can't pinpoint for you the origins of this  violence, but the initial reporting from our folks on the ground seem -- would  indicate that this is an outgrowth of the political tensions that we're seeing  within Lebanon today. I understand that there was a loss of life and that's  tragic. 
 Again, I can't pinpoint for you who started this or exactly the motivations  behind it, but what you -- it is fair to say that there are certain  irresponsible parties in Lebanon who have been provoking an atmosphere of  confrontation and antagonism within the political system. And the links between  those individuals and groups and outside entities are well known and they have  been engaged in a cynical manipulation of public perceptions in the political  process. 
 
And I do think it is fair to say that those attempts at cynical manipulation  of the political process certainly have had an effect on the overall atmosphere  in Lebanon and I think it is fair to say likely played a role in these kinds of  tensions that you're seeing manifested at -- today in Beirut and at the  university. 
 
QUESTION: Could it affect the results of Paris-3 conference? 
 
MR. MCCORMACK: Well, I think what it underscores is the fact that we  and the international system stand behind those who are implementing --  proposing and implementing the political and economic reforms that it is going  -- that are going to make Lebanon a more democratic, prosperous country. And we  stand with those people. 
 
It's well known who is on the other side of that fence, those individuals who  are ready to use violence, use extremism to whip up emotions within the Lebanese  political process in ways that are unproductive and detrimental to Lebanon and  to the Lebanese people. 
 
QUESTION: Sean, do you think that weakened Siniora inside Lebanon,  just as he's getting all this international support, to have the violence on the  streets? Has that weakened him at home politically? 
 
MR. MCCORMACK: I can't do a political analysis for you, but what it --  I guess -- I don't know what the intended effects of this violence were. Again,  I can't tell you what the motivations were behind it, but the reaction from the  international community is that we stand with the Siniora government and the  Lebanese people who are fighting for a better, more democratic, prosperous  Lebanon. 
 
Yeah. 
 
QUESTION: Do you think that this money, this $7 billion or so that's  been pledged will somehow help the political situation there? Is that your wish  that it will somehow embolden the Siniora government and improve his standing  within his own people in Lebanon? 
 
MR. MCCORMACK: Well, he -- his standing with his own people in Lebanon  is quite strong, it would appear. The money is intended -- there is a twofold  effect here. One, there are very real, practical effects in terms of budget,  support, reconstruction, security assistance. So those are very, very real,  tangible effects. But the other effect is an expression of political and  diplomatic support for the Siniora government by the international system. And  what that is intended to do is intended to support the forces of freedom,  democracy, and reform in Lebanon and Prime Minister Siniora is at the lead of  those -- at those forces. So the net effect is to strengthen Prime Minister  Siniora, I believe, within Lebanon. 
 
QUESTION: But with all of this political turmoil, you have been  speaking about seeing various companies that are interested in investing. How  are you going to encourage investor confidence in Lebanon when the political  situation is so unstable? You have -- you know, riots on the streets, people  being killed. It's a very difficult situation. 
 
MR. MCCORMACK: It is a difficult situation and it's an important  moment in Lebanon's history, but you have private sector individuals, hard-nosed  businessmen who take a look at the situation in Lebanon and say, "We are going  to invest in Lebanon." You have countries like -- companies like Cisco,  Microsoft, Occidental Petroleum, who say that, despite some of the political  turmoil in Lebanon right now, we are making a bet on Lebanon and Lebanon's  political future. And -- but that is that the Lebanese people are going to  succeed in overcoming the forces of violent extremism and oppression in that  country. Now, it's not to say that that is going to be an easy task. The Siniora  government and those forces for freedom and democracy in Lebanon need support.  They need support from the international community and you just saw a very  strong tangible demonstration of that today, not only from governments around  the world, but also the private sector, as well. 
 
QUESTION: How much did the private sector put forward? Do you have a  number or is it just promises? 
 
MR. MCCORMACK: I don't have a specific number. There was the $150  million OPIC facility that was worked with Citigroup. 
 
QUESTION: Is that a loan guarantee or something? 
 
MR. MCCORMACK: The -- you can check with OPIC as to the term of art  that is associated with that. I don't want to get in cross wires with the  bankers. But it is a tangible demonstration of support for Lebanon. 
 
QUESTION: Sean, are you confident in the stability of Siniora's  government? You said his standing is quite strong? I know there were some  concerns awhile back about his government being toppled. Are you guys confident  that he can stay in power? 
 
MR. MCCORMACK: We're confident that he has been a tenacious advocate  for freedom and political reform in Lebanon and we are going to continue to  support him. We believe that he has the support of large swaths of the Lebanese  population, despite the best efforts of countries like Syria and Iran and their  proxies, Hezbollah, the Siniora government has continued to govern in the face  of difficult challenges by those groups, by those countries who want to turn the  clock back in Lebanon. And Prime Minister Siniora I think has earned the respect  of other leaders around the world and that respect has manifested itself today  in Paris with the donations that you've seen. 
 
QUESTION: Could I just -- one more, just -- 
 
MR. MCCORMACK: Sure. 
 
QUESTION: I mean, do you still have concerns though, first as against  him toppling his government? 
 
MR. MCCORMACK: Certainly we are concerned that those who want to turn  the clock back. And it's our job as an international system to do everything  that we possibly can to see that that does not happen, that the role of the  Lebanese people for economic political reform and a better day for Lebanon to  succeed. 
 
QUESTION: But, can I -- 
 
MR. MCCORMACK: Yeah. Go ahead, Charlie. 
 
QUESTION: Well, I want to follow up on part of it which is that  earlier you made a comment to irresponsible parties -- 
 
MR. MCCORMACK: Right. 
 
QUESTION: -- in talking about today's activities. 
 
MR. MCCORMACK: Right. 
 
QUESTION: And you didn't name anybody in particular. And just now in  answer to the last question you mentioned Syria, Hezbollah. Do you include the  Government of Syria in terms of irresponsible parties in today's activities?  
 
MR. MCCORMACK: Well, I'm trying to make a -- excuse me -- a settle  point and that is that I can't tell you exactly who is responsible for fomenting  the violence at the university today in Beirut. But what I'm trying to indicate  is that the atmosphere that allowed that to move forward was created by those  parties like Hezbollah and their outside supporters, Iran and Syria. They have  created an atmosphere of political tension in Lebanon where they have directly  challenge the role of the Lebanese people for political and economic reform and  for freeing the Lebanese people and their country from the oppression that they  lived with for 20 years during Syrian occupation. So that's -- I'm trying to get  at the point, they have created this atmosphere in which these kinds of  political tensions have now begun to manifest themselves in violence in the  streets. 
 
Yeah, Elise. 
 
QUESTION: Sean, you have the violence on the streets which seems much  more of an urgent, immediate problem than the money that you're pledging today  is ultimately for long term reconstruction to help the government with the debt  problems, strengthen its hand on the government. But I mean, how can you help  with the situation that's on the ground today to prevent it from overtaking the  kind of seeds that you're sowing right now for the long term stability of it?  
 
MR. MCCORMACK: Well, in the immediate term, it's the Lebanese security  forces that are going to have to deal with the current tensions and the Lebanese  political leadership. Now, I understand that across the board, the political  leadership has called for calm in Lebanon and certainly that is an important  action. But in the immediate term, it is going to have to be the Lebanese that  deal with the violence that you're seeing in Beirut. 
 
QUESTION: Three or four months ago, the -- maybe a bit longer - the  White House and yourself issued, this is to follow on from Libby's question --  
 
MR. MCCORMACK: Right. 
 
QUESTION: -- issued a very strong statement saying that you feared for  Siniora's -- Prime Minister Siniora's life and that there were forces working to  get him, basically. Do you still stand by that statement? 
 
MR. MCCORMACK: Yeah. 
 
QUESTION: Is the situation still the same or is it even more dire than  when you -- 
 
MR. MCCORMACK: It hasn't -- I can't tell you if it's anymore dire at  the moment. But certainly, there are forces that want to stop progress towards a  free democratic prosperous Lebanon. We've seen that. We've seen them assassinate  and attempt to kill numerous individuals. They succeeded in killing a former  prime minister. They succeeded in killing people like Pierre Gemayel. And we  have no reason to believe that that threat has abated in any way. It is I  suspect that that threat will continue while those forces that are responsible  for violent actions feel threatened by things like UN Security Council  Resolution 1559, 1701 and the International Tribunal that is going to bring to  justice those responsible for the murder for former Prime Minister Hariri. So as  long as those -- I would suggest to you, as long as those threats remain to  those individuals who are responsible for this violence, then the threat of  violence will likely continue. 
 
QUESTION: But do you think it was a good idea for him to leave his  country at this time to go to Paris? I mean, doesn't the threat that -- of him  being out of the country that things could become even more difficult for him?  
 
MR. MCCORMACK: He's the head of government. He has to be able to  represent the Lebanese Government and the Lebanese people. And we think that it  is absolutely appropriate and right for him to represent Lebanon and a hopeful  future for Lebanon in Paris today. 
 
Yeah. 
 
QUESTION: Sean, how does the U.S. read reports that Saudi Arabia and  Iran are basically intensifying efforts to broker a solution in Lebanon? 
 
MR. MCCORMACK: Look. If we are regional actors who want to play a  positive role in Lebanon in trying to help the Lebanese reach the political  accommodations that they need to reach in order to move their political process  forward, then certainly, that is positive. Amr Mussa has made very, very public  efforts in that regard. He has briefed Secretary Rice on those efforts, so we're  fully cognizant of those. 
 
If there are other efforts, then certainly, that would be positive as long as  they are welcomed by the Lebanese Government. What would be of great concern to  us as well as others would be any attempts to negotiate or broker solutions over  the head of the Lebanese people and not with the full consent and participation  of the Siniora government. 
 
QUESTION: Has the Saudi Arabian authorities been keeping you --  keeping the United States informed about such diplomatic efforts? 
 
MR. MCCORMACK: They can speak for themselves about what they may or  may not be involved in. 
 
QUESTION: Are you going to see any positive action to come from Iran  regarding the Hezbollah in Lebanon?  
MR. MCCORMACK: Have we seen anything? 
 
QUESTION: Are you -- do you expect anything like that? 
 
MR. MCCORMACK: They have, over the past 20 years or so -- 
 
QUESTION: No, any positive action? 
 
MR. MCCORMACK: Well, let me just -- let me put it in historical  context for you. They -- Iran helped create Hezbollah and they have continued to  support Hezbollah during the 20-plus years that they helped create it. And I  don't, at this point, see any intention on the Iranians' part, at least any sort  of public intention, to try to play a more positive role via Hezbollah in  Lebanon's future.